Tomasz Berkieta vs Gilberto Ravasio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Berkieta's recent performance on second serve shows a higher win percentage at 44.77% compared to Ravasio's 35.67%. Does this suggest an edge in maintaining service games for Berkieta? Likely, yes, given the correlation with match prediction accuracy.
• When examining return game stats, Ravasio has an advantage on opponents' second serve returns at 51.68% compared to Berkieta's 44.26%. Could Ravasio's return game put pressure on Berkieta's service games? It's quite possible.
• Berkieta falls behind in returning first serves, winning just 24.21% of points, while Ravasio leads with 36.77%. This indicates Ravasio may have a stronger overall return game, a potential advantage.
• Under pressure, Ravasio shows better breakpoint-saving ability at 62.07%, in contrast to Berkieta's 53.07%, hinting that Ravasio might handle critical points more effectively.
• Over the past year, Berkieta has had a better overall win rate at 56.9%, compared to Ravasio's 44%. Could this higher win rate translate into greater match confidence for Berkieta? Potentially, yes.
• Both players perform best on clay surfaces, with Berkieta having a slightly higher winning percentage (52%) than Ravasio (48%), giving Berkieta a slight surface edge.
• Competition level analysis shows Berkieta mainly plays at Futures/ITF $10K events with a win rate of 61.11%, while Ravasio has struggled more at the same level with a 44% winning rate. Would Berkieta's success at this level indicate better adaptability? It seems likely.
• Berkieta has faced weaker opponents with an average rank of 343.98 compared to Ravasio's opponents at an average rank of 204.44. Does facing stronger opponents better prepare Ravasio? It might give Ravasio an edge in experience.
• In deciding set performances, Ravasio is slightly ahead with a 56% win rate, compared to Berkieta's 50%, suggesting Ravasio could have the mental toughness in crucial, tight match situations.
• When it comes to break point conversion, Ravasio exhibits a more effective performance, converting 41.67% of opportunities versus Berkieta's 28.93%, indicating Ravasio's potential to capitalize in critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (July 31, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the current statistics of both players, Berkieta holds a slight edge in the second serve points won, which is critical as it helps in maintaining service games under pressure. However, Ravasio presents a robust return game, notably outperforming Berkieta on both opponents' second and first serve return points, which could pose a significant challenge for Berkieta.

Ravasio's ability to convert break points more effectively combined with superior breakpoint-saving capabilities suggests a tactical advantage in close games. While Berkieta's overall win rate this past year is higher, Ravasio has consistently faced tougher competition, possibly giving Ravasio an upper hand in competitive resilience.

On clay, both player’s favored surface, Berkieta edges out slightly in terms of matches won, reflecting a surface-specific familiarity and comfort. However, if the match were to extend into a deciding set, Ravasio's strong deciding set record might tilt the scales in their favor.

Taking these factors into account, while Berkieta has shown superior overall match performance ratios over a longer period, Ravasio's strengths in critical competitive aspects suggest they may have the upper hand in this upcoming match. Therefore, based on the comparative analysis, Ravasio is favored to emerge as the winner in this encounter.